Rand, Ayn. Atlas Shrugged. (New York, NY: Penguin Group, 1992.) 1168 pp.
Reviewed by Mark Twain,Los Osos High School , Rancho Cucamonga , CA .
It is the 1950s, a time of robber barons and transcontinental railroads, with the barons of the rail and plunder providing the necessary genius required to run human society. Since apparently an IQ of 100 means that you're too stupid to hammer nails in this universe, huh, I don't remember humanity losing 99% of it's most intelligent population until the average became dumber than chimps. Thus enters our hero, Dagny Taggart, the brains behind Taggart Transcontinental, a railroad company that may or may not be the biggest in the fictional States of America. (Odd as it might seem in a world where the average human is too stupid to eat without it being fed to him, this one is of normal intelligence, that is, normal for us, almost.)
In between sleeping with as many intelligent (Someone doesn't understand standard deviation and bell curves, if the average human is too stupid to live, the most intelligent human on the damned fictional planet would also be too stupid to live. Unless the standard deviation is huge, say if the difference between the dumbest person and the smartest is the difference in computing power between one bit of ram and the entire bloody universe. Then the intelligent people can be actually smart, problem is, if that's the case, evolution would have made the fictional world filled with hyper intelligent people aeons ago, people too stupid to live tend to leave the gene pool, increasing the average.) men as possible our hero attempts to save Taggart Transcontinental, spoiler: she fails. All the while society increasing converges against the people smart enough to run their own companies, by taking everything they worked for away from them. (Explain to me how you can be not too stupid to live and still be capable of getting everything you own taken away from you by people too stupid to live. Cause that sounds like a pretty major case of being too stupid to live to me. On second thought, the intelligence bell curve thing is completely plausible.)
The moral of the story?
"Don't take away the work of those more intelligent than you, because apparently that's possible and you won't fail or die in the attempt."
I did not speak of characterization as all of the characters may be summarized in one sentence, one short sentence. With the phrase "and is stupid" appended to the end of all of them.
Reviewed by Mark Twain,
It is the 1950s, a time of robber barons and transcontinental railroads, with the barons of the rail and plunder providing the necessary genius required to run human society. Since apparently an IQ of 100 means that you're too stupid to hammer nails in this universe, huh, I don't remember humanity losing 99% of it's most intelligent population until the average became dumber than chimps. Thus enters our hero, Dagny Taggart, the brains behind Taggart Transcontinental, a railroad company that may or may not be the biggest in the fictional States of America. (Odd as it might seem in a world where the average human is too stupid to eat without it being fed to him, this one is of normal intelligence, that is, normal for us, almost.)
In between sleeping with as many intelligent (Someone doesn't understand standard deviation and bell curves, if the average human is too stupid to live, the most intelligent human on the damned fictional planet would also be too stupid to live. Unless the standard deviation is huge, say if the difference between the dumbest person and the smartest is the difference in computing power between one bit of ram and the entire bloody universe. Then the intelligent people can be actually smart, problem is, if that's the case, evolution would have made the fictional world filled with hyper intelligent people aeons ago, people too stupid to live tend to leave the gene pool, increasing the average.) men as possible our hero attempts to save Taggart Transcontinental, spoiler: she fails. All the while society increasing converges against the people smart enough to run their own companies, by taking everything they worked for away from them. (Explain to me how you can be not too stupid to live and still be capable of getting everything you own taken away from you by people too stupid to live. Cause that sounds like a pretty major case of being too stupid to live to me. On second thought, the intelligence bell curve thing is completely plausible.)
The moral of the story?
"Don't take away the work of those more intelligent than you, because apparently that's possible and you won't fail or die in the attempt."
I did not speak of characterization as all of the characters may be summarized in one sentence, one short sentence. With the phrase "and is stupid" appended to the end of all of them.