Bradbury, Ray. Fahrenheit 451. (New York, NY: Del Rey Books, 1981). 165 pp.
Review by David Lim, Los Osos High School, Rancho Cucamonga, CA.
What
 is there to say about this novel other than that its society is 
frighteningly similar to that of ours? Each event that our protagonist, 
Guy Montag, experiences resembles, in some way, a prediction of what is 
to come, should we continue to fall short in becoming matured human 
beings. Set in some utopian future, this dystopian novel beings with a 
terrifying ritual, book burnings of all works of merit. This moment 
makes clear to audiences that all is indeed not well in this universe 
that Bradbury plotted. With the idea of dystopia growing in popularity 
amongst readers and writers, Bradbury shows a significant difference of a
 what dysoptia disguises itself to be, which -- again-- is located in 
the first three pages of the novel. This method of beginning, as well as
 staying, outside of the comfort zone of dystopian novels -- that being 
some showing of a clean and contained society (The Giver, by Lois Lowry,
 comes to mind)-- snatched away my attention and kept it to the end. 
With fantastic imagery of fire, night, and machinery, symbols of 
complacency, tension, and fear come to be revealed within the author and
 stirred within the reader. These symbols aren't too obscured either, as
 Guy Montag's mind peaks to a breaking point as he proceeds through this
 existential crisis placed upon him after admitting to his wife that he 
had stashed a bundle of banned books and a Christian Bible. Montag's 
torment is clear enough for any high school student to catch onto, a 
definite plus to Bradbury in terms of description, plausibility, and 
plot. 
Plausibility is simply all too strong with this work. Teen violence?
 Facades of happiness? Insanity? Misfortunes existing in this work are 
all too real thanks to the stories of one of Bradbury's most mysterious 
characters, Clarrise McClellan, a sixteen-year old girl of many stories 
and questions. Though not really given physical detail, McClellan is 
indeed beautiful as an intellectual, and perhaps one of the only few 
that exist in such a society. Because of her "beauty" she is ridiculed 
and rejected as insane by her classmates in school and, consequentially,
 skips school very often to explore the outskirts of the utopia. I 
refuse to say anymore about this lovely character as she is too 
fantastic to be spoiled among those who are reading this. 
Every complication that Montag encounters is no simple coincidence, 
each of his actions directly affect his social and mental outcome; in 
short, the character development for our protagonist is so natural and 
so "juicy" that it seems as if he were actually telling Bradbury what to
 write and what to argue.
I would encourage that this book be read by every single student, so
 long as they wish to mature into someone respectable and humane. I do 
not see any significant shortcomings in this novel; every piece was 
coherent and appreciable.
 
Great review! Would you say that this novel can rdraw any parallels to your life?
ReplyDelete-Jonathan S.
Great book and review. I remember reading this and not quite understanding it, but your review clarified much of my question.I really like your style of analysis and I want to be able to analyze books like you.
ReplyDelete- Justin Choe
In other words, if I do not wish to be respectable and/or humane, I should not read this book? Or is it sort of like the no true Scotsman thing? Or perhaps it's sort of a prerequisite kind of thing, where you need traits x, y, and z to qualify for achievement Ω but having only x doesn't influence the outcome one way or another. In other words, y iff x or not y if not x?
ReplyDeleteAnd beware the usage of the phrase "any highschooler" untill the June of this year, since I am and am not a highschooler to be various statements pertaining to highschoolers and the null hypothesis of their veracity.
K. Lin